Loading...
Home / Installing ORE (Linux)

Home Forums Help Installing ORE (Linux)

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #6162
    williamcapra
    Participant

    Hi,

    currently installing ORE on ubuntu.
    I followed instructions in the documentation and everything seems ok.
    No errors in make, no errors in test suites.

    Then I tried to execute: sudo make install, to copy library and header in usr/local.
    The command completed with

    —————————————————————————————-
    make[2]: Nothing to be done for ‘install-exec-am’.
    /bin/mkdir -p ‘/usr/local/share’
    /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 ./config ‘/usr/local/share’
    /usr/bin/install: omitting directory ‘./config’
    Makefile:435: recipe for target ‘install-dist_dataDATA’ failed
    make[2]: *** [install-dist_dataDATA] Error 1
    make[2]: Leaving directory ‘/home/ubuntu/source/OpenRiskEngine/Engine-1.8.2.0/OREData’
    Makefile:767: recipe for target ‘install-am’ failed
    make[1]: *** [install-am] Error 2
    make[1]: Leaving directory ‘/home/ubuntu/source/OpenRiskEngine/Engine-1.8.2.0/OREData’
    Makefile:463: recipe for target ‘install-recursive’ failed
    make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1
    —————————————————————————————-

    Any idea?

    Many thanks

    William

    #6163
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hi William

    I have to confess that I’ve never tested make install on any of the ORE libraries, we really get that make command for free from automake, but have never needed to use it.

    Did you try make install on QuantLib and did that work? and is there a reason you want to install the ORE libraries in /usr/local/share?

    Regards,
    Niall.

    #6165
    williamcapra
    Participant

    Hi Niall,

    I successfully installed QuantLib with sudo make install.
    I’d like to install ORE in /usr/local because I think it’s the cleanest solution to have ORE (as QuantLib) shared across all users.

    Is there any information I can provide to let you understand why the install is failing?

    BR,

    William

    #6178
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hi William,

    I’m not sure actually, I’ll try to test it myself and see what I get.

    Regards,
    Niall.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.